Reported Cases
- CrateTech, Inc. v. StockBox Logistics, LLC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50042 (D. Kan. April 16, 2015) (trade secret case)
- Value Place Franchise Servs., LLC v. Hugh Black-St. Mary Enters., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5541 (D. Kan. January 16, 2015) (breach of contract)
- United States ex rel. Minge v. Tect Aero., Inc., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64129 (D. Kan. May 8, 2012) and 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46360 (D. Kan. April 3, 2012) (qui tam case)
- Totonelly v. Galichia Med. Group, P.A., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24202 (D. Kan. February 27, 2012) (breach of contract)
- Braun v. Promise Reg’l Med. Center-Hutchinson, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145018 (D. Kan. December 16, 2011) (breach of contract)
- Planned Parenthood of Kan. & Mid-Missouri v. Moser, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117526 (D. Kan. October 11, 2011); and Planned Parenthood of Kan. & Mid-Missouri v. Brownback, 799 F. Supp. 2d 1218 (D. Kan. 2011); Reversed by, Vacated by, Remanded by Planned Parenthood of Kan. & Mid-Mo. v. Moser, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5467 (10th Cir. Mar. 25, 2014) (Title X/Supremacy Clause/1st Amendment)
- Karraker v. Rent-A-Center, Inc., 411 F.3d 831 (7th Cir. 2005) (gender preference discrimination)
- United States ex rel. Sikkenga v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield, 472 F.3d 702 (10th Cir. 2006) (qui tam case)
- Randles v. Galichia Med. Group, P.A., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92428 (December 18, 2006) (dismissal of ERISA benefit plan action)
- United States ex rel. Wynne v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95103 (D. Kan. December 8, 2006) (qui tam case)
- Endotech USA v. Biocompatibles Int’l PLC, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18623 (E.D. La. October 24, 2000)
- Maximus, Inc. v. Thompson, 78 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Kan. 1999) (noncompete/trade secret/breach of contract)
- United States ex rel. Hafter v. Specter Emergency Care, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (D. Kan. 1998); affirmed United States ex rel. Hafter v. Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc., 190 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 1999) (qui tam case)
- Paul’s Beauty College v. United States, 885 F. Supp. 1468 (D. Kan. 1995)
- Curtis 1000 v. Pierce, 905 F. Supp. 898 (D. Kan. 1995); and 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15942 (October 25, 1994); and 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12410 (D. Kan. August 24, 1994)
- City of Wichita v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 24 F.3d 1282; 1994 (10th Cir. 1994); 24 F.3d 1282 (D. Kan. 1994) (telephone franchise fees)
- Woodmont Corp. v. Rockwood Ctr. Partnership, 858 F. Supp. 158 (D. Kan. 1994); 852 F. Supp. 948 (D. Kan. 1994); and 811 F. Supp. 1478 (D. Kan. 1993) (breach of contract and defamation)
- Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. Towers Financial Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20238 (D. Kan. December 1, 1992) (personal jurisdiction)
- Peoples Nat’l Bank v. Darling, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4056 (D. Kan. March 18, 1992)
- Koch Oil Co. v. Shaw, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1344 (D. Kan. January 6, 1992)
- Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. Towers Financial Corp., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20238 (December 1, 1992)
- Lodgistix, Inc. v. Tollman-Hundley Hotels Corp., 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16025 (D. Kan. October 31, 1991)
- Peoples Nat’l Bank v. Darling, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4230 (D. Kan. April 1, 1991) and 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4056 (March 18, 1992)
- Wright v. United States, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19479 (D. Kan. January 27, 1991)
- Data Prods. v. Reppart, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16330 (D. Kan. 1990) (copyright infringement)
- St. Mary of Plains College v. Higher Education Loan Program, Inc., 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15721 (D. Kan. December 15, 1989)
- Peoples’ Sav. & Loan Asso. v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Asso., 677 F. Supp. 1104 (D. Kan. 1988)
- Baker v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co., 788 F.2d 650 (10th Cir. 1986) (breach of contract)
- Meairs v. Webber, 342 P.3d 2; 2015 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 52 (January 23, 2015) (farm lease)
- Traster v. Traster, 301 Kan. 88; 339 P.3d 778 (2014); and 48 Kan. App. 2d 356 (2012)
- Hill v. Kan. Dep’t of Labor, 292 Kan. 17; 248 P.3d 1287 (2011); and 42 Kan. App. 2d 215 (2009)
- Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A., 279 Kan. 755 (2005) (heart surgeon restrictive covenants) (counsel for defendant) and Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A., 285 Kan. 485 (2007)
- Welch v. Via Christi Health Partners, 281 Kan. 732 (2006) (minority rights in LP/LLC merger) (counsel for defendant)
- Grace v. Grace, 117 P.3d 907, 2005 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 163 (August 19, 2005)
- South Central Kansas Health Ins. Group v. Harden & Co. Ins. Servs., 278 Kan. 347 (2004) (school district self-insurance pool)
- In re Estate of Robinson, 231 Kan. 300; 644 P.2d 420 (1982)
- Wichita Clinic, P.A. v. Louis, 185 P.3d 946 (Kan. App.2008) (family practice physician restrictive covenant) (counsel for plaintiff)
- Yordy v. Osterman, 37 Kan. App. 2d 132 (Kan. App. 2007) (best interests test in selecting school for minor child) (counsel for petitioner)
- Briggs v. Briggs, 1997 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1089 (February 7, 1997) (defamation case)
- Groves v. Mut. Benefit Life Ins. Co., 1996 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1217 (February 16, 1996) and 1994 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 502 (January 7, 1994)
- Tilcock v. Westfahl, 1994 Kan. App. Unpub. LEXIS 626 (November 10, 1994)
- Wichita Wire, Inc. v. Lenox, 11 Kan. App.2d 459 (1986) (injunction to protect purchased good will, which established the standards in Kansas for the granting of temporary injunctive relief)
- Rettiger v. Clark, 1985 Kan. App. LEXIS 816 (June 13, 1985)
Qui Tam Litigation
Mr. Ayers has successfully defended qui tam (whistleblower) cases, such as Wynne v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95103 (December 8, 2006) and 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27832 (April 21, 2006)(dismissal of False Claims Act case); U.S. ex rel. Sikkenga v. Regence Bluecross Blueshield of Utah, et al., 472 F.3d 702 (10th Cir. 2006) (amicus curiae in False Claims Act case). Mr. Ayers served as Relators’ counsel in recently settled U.S. of America ex rel. Barnes, et al. v. Akal Security, Inc., Case No. 04-1325—MLB (D. Kan. 2008)(Dept. of Defense security guard contract), resulting in judgment for the United States in the amount of $18 million; and successfully resolved a three-year investigation of an aerospace contractor with no finding of fault and no payment of money by the contractor client.
Healthcare Litigation
In the last several years, Mr. Ayers brought to successful resolution, without any admission of liability, a qui tam case arising out of the False Claims Act; successfully mediated the termination of agreements that allegedly violated the prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine; successfully enforced a number of restrictive covenants imposed on members of medical practices; and assisted in the separation of several physician practices from larger physician groups.
Commercial and Complex Litigation
Mr. Ayers has appeared in more than 40 injunction lawsuits in state and federal court where the issues arose out of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, or unfair competition. As a young lawyer, he second-chaired and briefed Kansas’ leading trade secret case, Koch Engineering Company, Inc. v. Faulconer (1980). He also tried and defended the appeal in Kansas’ leading irreparable harm case, Wichita Wire v. Lennox (1986). In his injunction practice, Mr. Ayers tries most of his cases to the court, but he has also tried cases to juries where the issues included fraud, breach of contract, or business defamation. For example, in May 2008 Mr. Ayers obtained a jury verdict of $250,000 plus punitive damages in a trade secret/breach of fiduciary duty case. David T. Webb & Co. et al. v. Gorges et al., Case No. 05 CV 1887 (Kan. 18th Jud. Dist. 2008).
Prior Legal Experience
Attorney, IBM Corporation (1980-1981), Armonk, New York